Orbisolyx Review 2026: Blocked in Italy, and the Same Website as Auralyex
CONSOB ordered Italian internet providers to block orbisolyx.com under resolution 24002 on 18 May 2026, for offering investment services to the Italian public without authorisation. The site names no regulator, no company and no terms, and runs the same template as Auralyex. We score it 0.9 out of 10.
Quick facts
| Legal entity | None named anywhere on the site |
|---|---|
| Regulator | Unlicensed |
| Licence number | None. No regulator is named at all |
| Headquarters | Not published |
| Minimum deposit | € 3,000 |
| Maximum leverage | Not published |
| Withdrawal time | Not published |
| Segregated funds | Not claimed |
| Website | orbisolyx.comnot linked: see our verdict |
Orbisolyx has a homepage of roughly 1,500 characters, a login button, and no other information about itself at all. No regulator, no company, no address, no licence, no pricing, no terms.
It is also, sentence for sentence, the same website as another broker blocked by the same regulator in the same week.
What CONSOB did
CONSOB, Italy’s securities regulator, holds a power most authorities do not: under article 7-octies of legislative decree 58/1998 it can order Italian internet service providers to block a website rather than merely warn about it.
Resolution 24002, dated 18 May 2026, names www.orbisolyx.com and webtrader.grumblinion-radiex.com.
The stated reason is CONSOB’s standard formula for these orders:
l’operatività in esame si configura quale esercizio professionale verso il pubblico italiano di servizi di investimento in violazione dell’art. 18, comma 1, del Tuf
“the activity under examination constitutes the professional provision, to the Italian public, of investment services in breach of article 18, paragraph 1, of the TUF.”
Note what a blocking order implies about timing. Regulators do not reach for the strongest remedy first. By the time CONSOB ordered providers to make this site unreachable, it had concluded that Italian residents were being actively solicited.
The same website, twice
Auralyex was blocked by CONSOB in the same sitting, under the adjacent resolution number. We read both sites on 18 September 2026, and they are the same build.
Here are the section headings of each homepage, in the order they appear:
| Orbisolyx (English) | Auralyex (Italian) | Literal translation |
|---|---|---|
| Making Trading Effortless | Il trading remoto reso semplice | Remote trading made simple |
| Reliable Safety Protocols | Protocolli di sicurezza rigorosi | Strict security protocols |
| Access to Multiple Assets | Moltitudine di opzioni di trading | A multitude of trading options |
| Flexible Account Choices | Varietà di account eccezionale | Exceptional account variety |
| Supporting Trader Development | Una piattaforma incentrata sulla crescita | A platform focused on growth |
| Aiming to succeed in the digital trading space? | Se vuoi davvero avere successo nel tuo percorso di trading online… | If you really want to succeed in your online trading journey… |
Six headings, same order, same meaning. The opening paragraph matches too: “Online trading isn’t what it once was. With services like Orbisolyx, traders can access a wide range of functions to trade with ease” against “Il mondo del trading online è cambiato notevolmente. Ora i trader hanno accesso a un’ampia gamma di funzionalità che li aiutano a operare in modo fluido ed efficace.”
The rest of the fingerprint lines up:
- Same URL structure. Both serve the homepage from
/en/homeand/it/homerather than the root. - Same footer format. “Copyright © 2025 Orbisolyx All rights reserved.” and “Copyright © 2025 Auralyex Tutti i diritti riservati.” Both dated 2025.
- Same size. Around 1,500 and 1,800 characters of text on the entire homepage.
- Same brand shape. Both invented Latinate names ending in
-yx. - Same portal trick, described below.
One detail gives away how quickly this was assembled. Auralyex’s /en/home page serves Italian. The English path exists, the language switcher is wired up, and the content behind it was never translated. Somebody cloned a template, changed the brand name, and did not check the second language.
The deposit portal is on a domain with no connection to the brand
This is the part worth understanding, because it defeats the check most careful people actually run.
CONSOB’s resolution names two web addresses for each of these firms. One is the marketing site. The other is where clients log in and deposit:
| Brand | Marketing site | Where you actually deposit |
|---|---|---|
| Auralyex | auralyex.co |
webtrader.possares-renoyx.com |
| Orbisolyx | orbisolyx.com |
webtrader.grumblinion-radiex.com |
Read those second-column entries again. Possares-renoyx. Grumblinion-radiex. Neither contains the brand name. Neither is a word. Neither means anything.
That is not laziness, it is the point. A person who is told to check a broker before depositing will usually search the brand name, and might search the domain on the page they first landed on. Almost nobody re-runs the check on the URL in the address bar after they have clicked through to the account area. So the domain that takes the money is one nobody searches, and it can be replaced next month without touching the brand.
Three other firms in the same CONSOB batches use the identical architecture: Activ Markets deposits through ac-markets-webtraderplatform.org, Investenix through investenixpro.com, and MRX Capital Trading through mrxspectron-markets.com. In MRX’s case CONSOB names only the portal domain, which means by the time the regulator acted, the marketing site it came from had already gone.
What the site does not say
| What we check on every broker | What Orbisolyx publishes |
|---|---|
| Regulator | None named |
| Licence number | None |
| Legal entity | None |
| Company registration number | None |
| Registered address | None |
| Account tiers or minimum deposit | None, despite a page headed “Flexible Account Choices” |
| Maximum leverage | None |
| Spreads or commission | None |
| Named payment methods | None |
| Terms and conditions | None found |
The heading “Reliable Safety Protocols” is worth a sentence of its own. It appears on a site that names no regulator, no bank, no entity and no segregation arrangement. It is the word “safety” doing the work that a disclosure would normally do.
What the score is made of
| Pillar | Weight | Score | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulation and licence tier | 30% | 0.4 | A CONSOB blocking order; no regulator claimed or held |
| Fund safety and withdrawals | 25% | 0.4 | “Safety protocols” asserted with no entity, bank or segregation named |
| Cost and execution | 15% | 2.0 | Nothing published to assess |
| Transparency | 15% | 0.6 | Publishes nothing, but states nothing untrue |
| Complaint record | 10% | 2.0 | A blocking order rather than a warning |
| Platform and support | 5% | 2.0 | No contact channel published at all |
0.9 out of 10, the same as Auralyex, because it is the same website.
If you have already deposited
- Stop, and treat any payment demanded before a withdrawal as the fraud itself.
- Check your bank statement for the name that actually took the money. Deposits run through
grumblinion-radiex.com, so the name on the statement is unlikely to be Orbisolyx, and that name is what your bank needs. - Screenshot the site and the portal URL now.
- Card payments: chargeback for services not provided, usually within 120 days. Cite CONSOB resolution 24002 of 18 May 2026.
- Bank transfers: request a recall immediately.
- Report it to CONSOB, and to your own national regulator. An Italian blocking order does not make the site unreachable anywhere else.
- Refuse recovery offers.
The check worth learning
Search the domain in the address bar, not the brand on the page. And check it again after you click through to the account area, because as this broker shows, the deposit page is frequently on a domain the marketing site never mentions and nobody thinks to search.
The wider pattern is in our investigation into the template factory.
Answered in detail
Safer alternatives
Rated Trusted or Neutral against the same six pillars. These link to our own reviews, not to the brokers, and no broker can pay to appear here.